Home POLITICS Osafo Maafo challenges Domelevo over $1m Kroll payment

Osafo Maafo challenges Domelevo over $1m Kroll payment

2
0


Senior Minister Yaw Osafo-Maafo has challenged the audit findings of the Auditor-General, Daniel Yaw Domelevo which accused the government of paying a private firm, Kroll and Associates $1 million for no work done.

The Auditor-General had indicted the Ministry of Finance and the Senior Minister accusing them of contracting Kroll Associates in 2017 to recover assets from identified wrongdoers; investigate allegations of wrongdoing among others, paid the company an amount of US$1 million (equivalent of GH¢4,890,000), yet there was no evidence of work done.

The Auditor-General had earlier indicated that the Senior Minister will be surcharged if he fails to provide evidence of actual work done by a private firm, Kroll and Associates.

But Osafo-Maafo in a letter addressed to the Auditor General explained that the company actually worked and there was ample evidence of the work done by the firm to merit government’s payment.

The Senior Minister also insisted that approval for the request for single-source procurement of professional services was obtained contrary to claims by the Auditor-General that they failed to seek approval from the Public Procurement Authority.

On the allegations that the Senior Minister through the Finance Ministry made full payment of more than GHS 1 million to Kroll and Associates with no proof of work done, Mr. Osafo-Maafo in his response said “Proofs of work done by Kroll and Associates are contained in their respective reports submitted to the office of the Senior Minister, COCOBOD, Bank of Ghana and Economic and Organized Crime Office (EOCO). The Consultancy services with Kroll is ongoing and expected to continue for a period of four years”.

The letter to the Auditor General also revealed that “one of Kroll’s reports for work done was in respect of LITHOvit agro-chemicals supplied by Seidu Agongo to COCOBOD for USD106,541,589.82 which is now the subject of a case in the High Court…The work done by Kroll in this case included Bank Analysis and Supplier Overview which disclosed that 90% of the revenue Seidu Agongo earned from COCOBOD was from agro-chemicals sales amounting to USD 106,541,589.82 which has turned out to be worthless.”

Mr. Osafo-Maafo in his response also stated that Kroll is still conducting investigations into several other cases for the Government of Ghana.

The firm is also assisting in assets recoveries and prosecution.

The government, through Information Minister Kojo Oppong Nkrumah, had earlier disputed the claims of the Auditor-General in his 2018 report, but the Auditor General insisted that he had still not been provided with information to prove that the company actually did the work for which it was paid.

Auditors’ Report on payment for work not done by Kroll Associates

The Auditor-General in its audit report stated that, “The Ministry procured the services of Kroll Associates in 2017 to recover assets from identified wrongdoers; investigate allegations of wrongdoing; provide evidence for assets recoveries; build capacity for the transfer of skills; advice on preventative techniques and structures to prevent and detect future corruption.

During our review of the contract with Kroll Associates, we noted that though there was no evidence of work done, the Ministry in 2018 paid an amount of US$1 million (equivalent of GH¢4,890,000) to the company. Our further review showed inconsistencies in some of the documentation. We noted for instance that though the contract was signed in September 2017, some of the invoices attached to the payment vouchers predated the award of the contract.

Management in response to this observation stated that they would make the records available to us later.

Considering the nature of the contract awarded, we are of the view that this project should have been executed for informed decision by government regarding how state resources have been used by public officers.

In view of the non-performance of Kroll Associates in executing the contract, we recommended that the contract be abrogated, and any monies paid to the company recovered immediately.”



Source link